Agree:

Open uri20161103 3 80guvy?1478206612

Brian Eno Artist

The basic income is needed to serve the creative genius of the community (i.e. the ‘scenius’)
Open uri20170717 4 5vz6ne?1500317938

Noam Chomsky Linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist

It comes from the right wing originally. Milton Friedman proposed it for example. From his point of view it was part of an effort to undermine welfare state measures. But it doesn’t have to have a reactionary component. It can be interpreted as something progressive. That people have rights. In fact if you read the universal declaration of human rights, 1948, take a look at article 45. It says peo... See More
Open uri20160822 3 11ie95d?1471892166

Tim O'Reilly Founder and CEO, O'Reilly Media. Investor. Studied at Harvard University.

I completely agree that Universal Basic Income is a good idea. But I think that’s just the beginning of the discussion.

Sign up to see 27 opinions on this topic:

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our terms and privacy conditions.

or Log in

Disagree:

Open uri20180817 4 5ckwy9?1534504811

Joseph Stiglitz Nobel laureate economist based at Columbia University

You want your government to think more carefully about targeting programmes that help those in need, rather than universal. That’s a trade-off given the budget constraints on the public sector
Open uri20180514 4 13efvqr?1526282600

Yuval Noah Harari Israeli historian and a tenured professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Paying people not to work will only increase inequality and rancor. [...] If universal basic income is aimed to improve the objective conditions of the average person in 2050, it has a fair chance of succeeding. But if it is aimed to make people subjectively more satisfied with their lot in order to prevent social discontent, it is likely to fail.
Open uri20180824 4 1nj5et4?1535125141

MIchael Hudson Economist. Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City.

The problem’s not only income, but what people have to spend it on. Paine didn’t talk about universal income, he talked about everybody should have the right to a place to live, a means of their own self-support. That’s independent from income. Once you economize and financialize it, you put in a distortion. You don’t want to give people income to buy what really should be public goods and servic... See More

Sign up to see 27 opinions on this topic:

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our terms and privacy conditions.

or Log in

Create a new topic