Agree:

Open uri20170328 4 nzun6m?1490732530

Mike Bloomberg American businessman and politician, former mayor of new york city

Noncommunicable diseases are a growing global crisis, especially in low-and-middle income countries. There’s substantial evidence that taxes and fiscal policies are essential to confronting this health threat.
Open uri20180119 4 1u93ds3?1516382377

Philip Hammond U.K. Treasury chief

Producers are already reformulating sugar out of their drinks [even before the sugar tax comes into effect]
Open uri20180921 4 1nckd7r?1537541296

David Haslam Chairman of the National Obesity Forum

Currently NOF [National Obesity Forum] are calling for a sugar tax on sugar sweetened beverages [SSBs], but a call for a tax for sugary foods is just around the corner.
Open uri20180921 4 rfgmqo?1537546381

Rachel Cooke British journalist

Some anti-obesity campaigners are busy arguing that the new sugar tax, which applies to any soft drink containing more than 5g of sugar per 100ml, should now be extended to, among other items, the huge caramel lattes sold by high street coffee shops. It isn’t, of course, very hard to see why, even before you learn that some of these vat-sized drinks contain up to 25 teaspoons of sugar (there are a... See More
Open uri20180119 4 y1smcw?1516363350

Jamie Oliver British celebrity chef and restaurateur

We should be big and bold. Who is running the country? The businesses who are profiting from ill health or is it us
Open uri20180119 4 17t34s8?1516359653

World Health Organization The United Nations' health agency

There is reasonable and increasing evidence that appropriately designed taxes on sugarsweetened beverages would result in proportional reductions in consumption, especially if aimed at raising the retail price by 20% or more
Open uri20180223 4 1tz0l17?1519393806

Government of the United Kingdom UK Government

This is independent confirmation that the soft drinks industry levy, a key part of our world-leading Childhood Obesity Plan, will be a potent tool in the fight against childhood obesity. Not only that, it will help save our children's teeth and cut rates of type 2 diabetes. Sugar-laden soft drinks are a recognised driver of childhood obesity and through our broader sugar reduction programme we're ... See More

Sign up to see 30 opinions on this topic:

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our Terms. You may receive sporadic notifications from us and can opt out any time.

or Log in

Disagree:

Open uri20180921 4 1xa2cdt?1537545635

Mark Mustio Republican member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives

We’re seeing that those places where families buy their food and groceries are starting to lose money, and we don’t want them to close.
Open uri20180921 4 m7k1fe?1537543707

Jacob Rees-Mogg British politician

The tax system is not there to tell us how to live our lives.
Open uri20181005 4 1dap0w3?1538728088

Paul Polman CEO, Unilever

In essence, there is nothing wrong with [sugar], it depends on how your diet is. In some products it makes more sense, in others not. I personally am very mindful of my sugar intake. But I don’t need a tax for that, nor do poor people need a tax for that. Poor people need to be helped not being poor, that’s probably a bigger thing than anything else.
Open uri20180921 4 1ecjxav?1537546749

Adam Smith Institute ASI is UK’s leading neoliberal think tank. See: @EamonnButler @Sam_Dumitriu @philip_salter @Da

The sugar tax means smaller bottles, higher prices and worse tasting recipes. What did you expect would happen?!
Open uri20180921 4 o6ykfq?1537548292

Tax Foundation Sound Tax Policy since 1937. Subscribe to updates here: https://t.co/8A1bVcQF8a

Our research has generally concluded that soda taxes are narrow, punitive taxes that are a budget risk not likely to solve America’s health issues. They’re a misguided attempt at solving a multifaceted health problem and will introduce many unintended fiscal consequences.
Open uri20180921 4 7l30rm?1537547183

Institute of Economic Affairs The Institute of Economic Affairs is the UK's original free-market think-tank, founded in 1955

Early evidence casts serious doubt on whether sugary drink taxes have ‘progressive’ health benefits either. Low-income consumers do not seem to have particularly elastic demand for sugary drinks. Even if they enjoyed disproportionate health gains from sin taxes, they would still suffer a net loss to their welfare and the tax would remain regressive in the traditional sense.
Open uri20180921 4 spaveu?1537546919

Christopher Snowdon 'The IEA's abrasive director of lifestyle economics' (Private Eye). Spectator Health. Tweeting

[People are] quite unresponsive to price hikes and do not significantly change their habits.

Sign up to see 30 opinions on this topic:

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our Terms. You may receive sporadic notifications from us and can opt out any time.

or Log in

Create a new topic